*BSD News Article 10199


Return to BSD News archive

Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
	id AA7414 ; Fri, 22 Jan 93 11:44:22 EST
Xref: sserve comp.org.sug:622 comp.org.usenix:3159 comp.unix.wizards:28295 comp.unix.bsd:10258
Newsgroups: comp.org.sug,comp.org.usenix,comp.unix.wizards,comp.unix.bsd,news.sys-admin
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!osyjm
From: osyjm@cs.montana.edu (Jaye Mathisen)
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: POSIX threatens our use of lp/lpr and friends
Message-ID: <1993Jan20.194433.8635@coe.montana.edu>
Sender: usenet@coe.montana.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: CS
References: <C15sst.JqA@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1993 19:44:33 GMT
Lines: 15


Can somebody please explain why palladium is a bad system?  I personally
don't like the hassle of the eclectic mix of lp and lpr and find it
a pain in the butt.

So I'm for standardizing on a consistent printer interface.

On the other hand, I'm not attached to palladium in any way, I guess I don't
really care what the standard is, as long as there is a standard...

So what's wrong with palladium?  Are there other printing systems out there?
-- 
 Jaye Mathisen, COE Systems Manager                (406) 994-4780
 410 Roberts Hall,Dept. of Computer Science
 Montana State University,Bozeman MT 59717	osyjm@cs.montana.edu