Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
id AA284 ; Sun, 31 Jan 93 14:01:11 EST
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU!werple.apana.org.au!pos!posgate!sleeper!raz
From: raz@sleeper.apana.org.au (Roland Turner)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: [386bsd] patch-kit inconsistancy?
Keywords: n
Message-ID: <C1K7DG.Fy@sleeper.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 10:20:03 GMT
References: <C15EBA.C4M@world.std.com> <1993Jan20.222526.13609@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <C1C4zn.27y@sleeper.apana.org.au> <1993Jan25.181241.21227@coe.montana.edu>
Organization: Desolation Road Railfan BBS
Lines: 35
osynw@gemini.oscs.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes:
>Defending Terry, I guess I wasn't obvious enough in my email to Chris@agate
>that the version of the patchkit in incoming was NOT for distribution.
>The reason for Terry's name in the kit is because he wrote the thing.
>However, that does not mean that he is responsible for it's co-ordination
>and release.
OIC. Apologies to Terry.
>Now, after adding some more patches and fixing a couple bugs in
>the installation/removal of the 500+ patches, (minor documentation
>and spelling fixes also), the new version is now OFFICIALLY released.
>I would recommend getting the new version, since it contains some
>important fixes.
Will this require removal of the entire second (not-for-release) patch
kit? (I know, my machine's stable, but I'm still a little wary about
it :-))
>>Even though I have an unnoficial pathkit, my system is FINALLY stable and
>>usable. (It even recognises my second 200M drive. Joy!) Darn.
>>
>That is/was my goal for this kit, and the accompanying boot disks. I
Well thank you very much. I am (extremely) please with the result so
far...
--
Bye for now.
- Raz.
raz@sleeper.apana.org.au (Roland Turner) (OH) 61 2 319 5700