Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA317 ; Sun, 31 Jan 93 14:02:48 EST Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:10626 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:42767 Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!ogicse!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!hasty From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: ATI Mach32 and Xfree86 or XS3? Message-ID: <1993Jan29.210800.21693@netcom.com> Date: 29 Jan 93 21:08:00 GMT Article-I.D.: netcom.1993Jan29.210800.21693 References: <1ka60dINNhp3@matt.ksu.ksu.edu> <1993Jan29.052847.11959@netcom.com> <1993Jan29.175523.13926@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) Lines: 16 With respect to RAMDACs and the Actix GraphicEngine line including the forthcoming 928 based from Actix, they use the AT&T 20C491-11 RAMDAC. Can anyone tell us if this RAMDAC going to be adequate for 16 bit and 24 bit plane operations ? For instance, does it introduce memory wait states for 16bit or 24bit operations as alluded in a previous posting that some RAMDAC do.. Thanks in advance, -- This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3 Amancio Hasty | Home: (415) 495-3046 | ftp-site depository of all my work: e-mail hasty@netcom.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming