Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA347 ; Sun, 31 Jan 93 14:04:01 EST Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:10644 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:42811 Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!caen!umeecs!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!hasty From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Subject: Re: ATI Mach32 and Xfree86 or XS3? Message-ID: <1993Jan30.054201.13974@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <1993Jan29.175523.13926@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> <1993Jan29.193936.13423@netcom.com> <1993Jan29.225541.20260@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1993 05:42:01 GMT Lines: 22 In article <1993Jan29.225541.20260@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE> roell@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Thomas Roell) writes: >first want to have more 928 baords tested under different conditions. >But as a rought estimate, 120k xstones in not only realistically, it's It is clear that the distributed XS3 is slower than yours... I am going to leave alone the speculations of how fast XS3 is going to be till I get a 928 board and I finish my work here.. Hope no one objects to this. On a different topic, Actix's 805 VLB has the same problem as my other board, it can't switch to Linear Mode. S3's nice example to switch the card to Linear Mode under DOS froze my system. According to S3, it did work on a local bus system... Also, my Actix 805 VLB card seems to be slower than my Actix 801 ISA card. -- This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3 Amancio Hasty | Home: (415) 495-3046 | ftp-site depository of all my work: e-mail hasty@netcom.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming