Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA1127 ; Tue, 23 Feb 93 14:27:06 EST Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrhub2!ncrgw2!psinntp!dsh!gary From: gary@dragon.dsh.org (Gary D. Duzan) Subject: Re: GCC 2.3.3 + kernels Organization: Delaware State Hospital References: <1l5h8tINN218b@obelix.uni-muenster.de> <1993Feb8.122818.8744@gmd.de> <JKH.93Feb8204548@whisker.lotus.ie> Message-ID: <C28wLx.HDz@dragon.dsh.org> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1993 18:27:31 GMT Lines: 19 In article <JKH.93Feb8204548@whisker.lotus.ie> jkh@whisker.lotus.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) writes: >I've had kernels making (and running) with gcc 2.3.3 for some time - I >don't know what the big problem is. You need to put #pragmas to control >structure packing in /usr/include/machine/segments.h, but that's really >about it (that and the occasional unwisely named function name or prototype >conflict). > >The kernel I'm currently running is gcc 2.3.3 compiled. > Do the modified sources work properly with the old GCC? If so, how much trouble would it be to set it up in a patchkit format? Gary D. Duzan Network Administrator Delaware State Hospital