Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
id AA1476 ; Tue, 23 Feb 93 14:43:15 EST
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:11317 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
From: cgd@gaia.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: A comment on 0.1 + 0.2.1 patchkit's stability
Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.misc
Date: 17 Feb 93 15:08:14
Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <CGD.93Feb17150814@gaia.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gaia.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: osynw@gemini.oscs.montana.edu's message of Wed, 17 Feb 1993 18:15:52 GMT
In article <1993Feb17.181552.19571@coe.montana.edu> osynw@gemini.oscs.montana.edu (Nathan Williams) writes:
>Now, if we could just get the Neosoft patches in, you could
>cd /usr/src
>make
>make install
as a stability test, my favorite is:
cd /usr/src
while 1
time make -k clean >& /dev/null
time make -k >& /dev/null
end
under the 0.2.1 patchkit, that'll run at least 3 or 4 times
straight thru (killed it myself, after that; each "make -k"
takes abour 1 hour 50 min on my machine)...
i used to not be able to get thru compiling libc w/o
it crashing horribly...
the patchkit helps a lot... 8-)
chris
--
Chris G. Demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
MENTALLY CONTAMINATED and proud of it!