*BSD News Article 11434


Return to BSD News archive

Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
	id AA1867 ; Tue, 23 Feb 93 15:01:45 EST
Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!aw2t+
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Message-ID: <gfW4aSq00iV3A61al_@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1993 22:33:50 -0500 
From: "Alex R.N. Wetmore" <aw2t+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: bad crashes w/ 386bsd
In-Reply-To: <1993Feb22.012232.24154@coe.montana.edu>
Lines: 60

Excerpts from netnews.comp.unix.bsd: 22-Feb-93 Re: bad crashes w/ 386bsd
by Nathan Williams@gemini.o 
> In article <8fVlfba00WBME6YGZo@andrew.cmu.edu> aw2t+@andrew.cmu.edu
(Alex R.N.
>  Wetmore) writes:
> >2) Everything just dies.  I can usuaully switch virtual consoles and
> >give it the 3 finger salute, but not much more.
>  
> I would suspect that #2 is directly related to 
> >  5 meg swap
>  
>  
> Try increasing your swap space.  5 Meg isn't much, and 386BSD doesn't
> do well when it starts to swap alot (though it doesn't make multiple
> copies of the same file and the same name like another PD O.S. :-)
>  
>  
> It's possible that some of the VM fixes are triggering some bad
> hardware in your machine...

Any way to do this without reinstalling?  Otherwise, has anyone made a
boot disk that will get my machine into nfs?  Also, what is the best way
to do a copy over nfs to make sure that all permissions get saved (since
cp isn't very good at that).

Also, I know that I have a revision B 386 chip (I am running on a circa
87 386dx/16).  Linux 0.95 (last time I ran it) used to give me some sort
of page fault errors, but I compiled the errors out of the kernel life
would be happy.  Could this be related in someway (I assume that the MMU
on my chip has a bug in it).  Would getting a new 386 fix this (I would
probably just upgrade to a 486sx motherboard).  Like I said, things used
to work great. 

> That sounds like my machine BEFORE the patchkit.  Now, after the 0.2.1
> patchkit, my machine has been up for a week at one time (needed to
> reboot to try out some kernel patches).
>
> I have only seen one crash since installing the patchkit, and I was
> at home when it happened so the message was lost when it rebooted.
>  
> >Looking through the
> >386bsd.BUGS list it seems they mention some scheduling problems that
> >sound like they could be causing the crashes too.  I haven't seen any
> >patches for that code outside of the patchkit though.  Anything I can do
> >about this?
>  
> 0.2 is supposedly the fix for this, when it is released.

Any word on when 0.2 is supposed to be released?  If it is soon enough I
might just upgrade swap when it comes out (since I assume it will
require a pretty large reinstall of everything).  The shared libs in 0.2
(which I hope will exist) should help life considerably, since I only
have a 97 meg BSD partition, which doesn't leave much space for adding
swap (I float between 5 and 10 megs free, don't like to go below that). 
Also, is there a vmstat program out there, so that I could actually see
how close I am to running into the top of swap space?

thanks,
alex