Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA2088 ; Thu, 25 Feb 93 10:11:17 EST Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: 386BSD Posix Compliance Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1993 02:19:14 GMT Message-ID: <C2xL43.HoK@sugar.neosoft.com> References: <1me016$4j8@agate.berkeley.edu> Lines: 14 In article <1me016$4j8@agate.berkeley.edu> wjolitz@soda.berkeley.edu (William F. Jolitz) writes: > Just to reassure people, 386BSD will remain POSIX compliant. Why? Bear with me. The point to standard interfaces is to make it easier to write portable code. If you don't care about that (and if you're making changes to the kernel interfaces this early in the game, you don't) why bother with POSIX? -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Oletko halannut suttasi tänään? 'U` Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.