Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA2091 ; Thu, 25 Feb 93 10:11:24 EST Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!pacbell.com!nic2.barrnet.net!news.usfca.edu!noc.usfca.edu!callis From: callis@noc.usfca.edu (Kim C. Callis) Subject: 386BSD v. Linux Message-ID: <1993Feb24.142553.18435@news.usfca.edu> Sender: usenet@news.usfca.edu (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: noc.usfca.edu Organization: University of San Francisco X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1993 14:25:53 GMT Lines: 25 Yeah, I know this title has been done before, but hopefully I can give it a different twist. Has anyone did an all out and out non-biased comparison between the two systems? Again a something beyond, "In this corner we have Linux and it sucks... On the otherhand 386BSD does a billion and one wonderful things, and we will now list them..." I just thought I would ask, since I am going to make a move towards one or the other since the time has come to say goodbye to Uncle Bill Gates' toy... MooSe DOS. Thanks for any replies... If this is a regular question, please e-mail me a response. -- ******************************************************************* * Kim C. Callis * * Univ. of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA * * EMAIL: callis@usfca.edu or callis@dons.ac.usfca.edu * ******************************************************************* DISCLAIMER: As long as nothing I say attempts to represent the views of the Univ. of San Francisco, they could care less what I have to say. Meaning that anything said, like it or not, is strictly my own personal opinion and views.