Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA2231 ; Mon, 01 Mar 93 10:50:14 EST Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.development:42 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:24 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrhub2!ncrgw2!psinntp!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Is fixing /bin/sh worthwhile? Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1993 12:26:44 GMT Message-ID: <C307wL.2nn@sugar.neosoft.com> References: <CONKLIN.93Feb23174603@talisman.kaleida.com> <1993Feb24.175756.7398@coe.montana.edu> Lines: 13 In article <1993Feb24.175756.7398@coe.montana.edu> nate@cs.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes: > As far as I'm concerned, I would *prefer* a working ash over a bash, > zsh, pd-ksh, or anything simply because of size. Seconded! The last thing we need is to bring in more MIT/FSF monsters when we have perfectly good small versions. I'd put a working ash on more than just BSD boxes. -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Oletko halannut suttasi tänään? 'U` Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.