*BSD News Article 11932


Return to BSD News archive

Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
	id AA2236 ; Mon, 01 Mar 93 10:50:27 EST
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrhub2!ncrgw2!psinntp!uuneo!sugar!peter
From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: 386BSD Posix Compliance
Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1993 12:47:26 GMT
Message-ID: <C308v4.2yA@sugar.neosoft.com>
References: <C2z38u.3BA@panix.com> <1993Feb25.080612.16553@gmd.de> <45636@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>
Lines: 14

In article <45636@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> cg18fbi@icogsci1.ucsd.edu (Richard Dante) writes:
> Thor, 0.1 has a lot of good patches and more are likely to come. When 0.2
> comes along if it's not your cup of tea, nobody's stopping you from sticking
> with 0.1 with all it's patches which is a perfectly fine system

You REALLY want to recapitulate the entire divisive history of UNIX in
miniature here, with new 0.1-based releases coming out? I don't see any
other way to continue work on filesystems, for example, on a variety of
platforms.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>.
 `-_-'   Oletko halannut suttasi tänään?
  'U`    
Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.