*BSD News Article 11941


Return to BSD News archive

Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
	id AA2250 ; Mon, 01 Mar 93 10:51:02 EST
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!cherokee!huntting
From: huntting@advtech.uswest.com (Brad Huntting)
Subject: Re: 386BSD vs BSDI
Message-ID: <1993Feb25.221456.14935@advtech.uswest.com>
Sender: news@advtech.uswest.com (Radio Free Boulder)
Nntp-Posting-Host: futureworld.advtech.uswest.com
Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies
References: <HALEY.93Feb23030107@husc11.harvard.edu> <1mdar0INNn5n@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <6407@krafla.rhi.hi.is>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1993 22:14:56 GMT
Lines: 33

In article <HALEY.93Feb23030107@husc11.harvard.edu> haley@husc11.harvard.edu (Elizabeth Haley) writes:
>The 1-800-ITS-UNIX thing?  What about, for instance, the mug in my
>office from another company with the phone number 1-800-SAY-UNIX?
>That company, needless to say, is not being litigated.

My understanding is that this issue was settled very early on and is no
longer contested.  BSDI agreed not to use (or advertise?) phone numbers
with the digits 8649 in them, and USL agreed.

Having succeeded in forcing BSDI to call all it's first production
release "gamma", USL is trying to stall the case until BSDI is
bankrupted.

They of course claim to have evidence that NET2 contains USL code, but
refuse to produce it or point out where it is.

They also say that NET2 was produced by people who themselfs were
"tainted" by prolonged exposure to USL propriatary code.  This is
taintamount to saying that these people (including many of the best
minds in the computer industry) are themselfs "USL propriatary", and
any code they produce which is remotely like anything found in unix(*)
belongs to USL.


brad

*       Unix is a trademark of USL, an infamous organized crime ring
	specializing in intellectual proporty scams.  USL is a spinoff
	of one of the longest running "legit" criminal estabilishments
	in U S history, AT&T, which violated various antitrust laws and
	utility regulations for most of this century.

**	U S WEST may not agree with the above statments.