Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
id AA2358 ; Mon, 01 Mar 93 10:55:41 EST
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
From: cgd@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: 386BSD vs BSDI (Fallacy #1)
Date: 27 Feb 93 13:06:55
Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <CGD.93Feb27130655@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <1mdar0INNn5n@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <6407@krafla.rhi.hi.is>
<1993Feb25.221456.14935@advtech.uswest.com>
<1mmsetINN2o8@life.ai.mit.edu> <1mod8tINNnv4@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eden.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: chet@odin.ins.cwru.edu's message of 27 Feb 1993 18:52:13 GMT
In article <1mod8tINNnv4@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> chet@odin.ins.cwru.edu (Chet Ramey) writes:
=>Come on, Charles, you're smarter than that. What you are remembering
=>is John Bass's list of files which *he* thinks are infinging (quite an
=>entertaining list, that). USL has said nothing publically.
Chet:
that *is* USL's much touted "partial list" -- it was even formatted
in the same way as the USL document...
chris
--
Chris G. Demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
MENTALLY CONTAMINATED and proud of it!