*BSD News Article 12751


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!peter
From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Some Sample Projects for 386BSD
Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1993 05:03:24 GMT
Message-ID: <C3v4pp.LHC@sugar.neosoft.com>
References: <9303090526.AA07265@fubar.cs.montana.edu> <1nqplq$m11@sax.sax.de>
Lines: 13

In article <1nqplq$m11@sax.sax.de> joerg@sax.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) writes:
> Sorry, i just don't understand why we should walk back??? Only for
> the gain of some speed? IMHO, mandoc isn't a bad thing,

Mandoc is somewhat of an improvement, since it tags textual entities
semantically rather than by format. Plus, there's work under way to
produce and SGML DTD that's freely translatable with a slight variant
of mandoc.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>.
 `-_-'   Oletko halannut suttasi tänään?
  'U`    
Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.