Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!gmd.de!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.th-darmstadt.de!iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de!deeken From: deeken@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Hannes Deeken) Subject: Re: 386BSD UUCP and News Sender: news@news.th-darmstadt.de (UseNet News Admin) Message-ID: <deeken.731923394@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1993 08:08:25 GMT Lines: 21 References: <C3oz2z.HqA@austin.ibm.com> <C3qK2M.By1@unx.sas.com> Nntp-Posting-Host: spelunke.iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de Organization: TU Darmstadt, ITI Keywords: 386BSD, UUCP, News sastdr@torpid.unx.sas.com (Thomas David Rivers) writes: >I have been wrestling with sendmail problems ever since I got started; >and about every other minute almost decide to chuck it for smail 2.5 >(which I was running before) - but with 386bsd, I now have a network >of machines and would like for mail to work between all of them and >the "outside" uucp connection. So why don't you use smail 3.1.28 instead of sendmail? Much easier to configure, and it does everything that sendmail does (except that you can't ruin your mail headers as much as you can with sendmail :) The diffs for 386BSD are about 7KB. Send me mail if you want them. Ciao, Hannes -- Hans-Christoph Deeken (deeken@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de) TH Darmstadt, Germany