Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:30882 comp.os.386bsd.questions:978 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ddsw1!chinet!randy From: randy@chinet.chi.il.us (Randy Suess) Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? Message-ID: <C4D87B.Au3@chinet.chi.il.us> Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX References: <1993Mar23.085058.13670@serval.net.wsu.edu>> <CGD.93Mar23030821@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <hwr.732890376@snert.ka.sub.org> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1993 23:35:35 GMT Lines: 15 In article <hwr.732890376@snert.ka.sub.org> hwr@pilhuhn.ka.sub.org writes: >There is another thing to consider: >386bsd has a stable BSD-FFS and stable networking, while there are bugs in >the Linux efs and in their networking. I was under the impression that linux also had something funky about the maximum size of file system partitions. Something like 40 megs? Or is that old hat? -- I am created Shiva the Destroyer; Death, the shatterer of worlds! Who is this dog meat who stands before me now? That's the biz, sweetheart. Randy Suess randy@chinet.chi.il.us