Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:30933 comp.os.386bsd.questions:991
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!bilby.cs.uwa.oz.au!warabi!mafm
From: mafm@cs.uwa.oz.au (Matthew McDonald)
Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box?
Message-ID: <mafm.732963822@warabi>
Sender: usenet@bilby.cs.uwa.edu.au
Nntp-Posting-Host: warabi
Organization: Dept. Computer Science, University of Western Australia.
References: <C4BowL.DK3@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> <1ome2o$1lu6@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <1993Mar23.085058.13670@serval.net.wsu.edu> <CGD.93Mar23030821@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <hwr.732890376@snert.ka.sub.org> <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1993 09:03:42 GMT
Lines: 12
Stephen Tweedie writes:
>It is fairly safe to say that efs and minix-fs are bug free now. They
>have been around a long time (relative to Linux - they are all
>obviously younger than the BSD ffs).
I don't think so. I can point you at people who lost gobs of
files to efs yesterday. No way is efs bug-free yet.
--
Matthew McDonald mafm@cs.uwa.oz.au
Dare to be naive. -- Buckminster Fuller