Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:31281 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1067 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!crcnis1.unl.edu!wupost!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!curtis From: curtis@cs.berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? Date: 26 Mar 1993 09:33:25 GMT Organization: CS Dept. Snakepit - Do Not Feed. Lines: 13 Message-ID: <1ouil5$cfk@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> <hwr.732964586@snert.ka.sub.org> <1ou728INNhfn@aludra.usc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cobra.cs.berkeley.edu In article <1ou728INNhfn@aludra.usc.edu> jimmyhua@aludra.usc.edu (Jimmy Huang) writes: > >Umm, yeah that's one of the things i hate about linux. If you do a quick >reboot, (i.e. flip the switch). your FS sometimes gets permanently screwed. The fs/fsck combination is supposed to be designed so that this cannot happen; if it does, it's a bug, and you should report it. >Is this true with 386BSD too? I doubt it. 386BSD's filesystem is very old. c