Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:31327 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1075 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!msuinfo!uchinews!mimsy!nmrdc1!dsc3pzp From: dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? Message-ID: <C4I71E.902@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> Date: 26 Mar 93 15:58:24 GMT References: <hwr.732890376@snert.ka.sub.org> <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> <1oqlf5$i8b@agate.berkeley.edu> Organization: Naval Medical Research & Development Command Lines: 13 In article <1oqlf5$i8b@agate.berkeley.edu> curtis@cs.berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin) writes: >I think we might see a lot more if Peter got round to putting a decent >shutdown/rc package in SLS. Peter is always willing to accept assistance from those who wish to help his volunteer effort. My SLS X & tcp/ip system at work is quite happy running e2fs. -- ============================================================================== phil perucci | "Any opinions expressed are my views, dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil | not the position of any organization" ==============================================================================