Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:31550 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1104 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!gumby!yale!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu!not-for-mail From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? Date: 28 Mar 1993 01:44:00 -0500 Organization: dis Lines: 17 Message-ID: <1p3hfg$geh@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> References: <hwr.732964586@snert.ka.sub.org> <1ou728INNhfn@aludra.usc.edu> <ins407x.733191967@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au> <C4JopF.KrH@sugar.neosoft.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.ai.mit.edu In article <C4JopF.KrH@sugar.neosoft.com> peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) writes: > > THe file system on 386BSD is the fastest and most solid I've seen on > ANY UNIX system, including other BSD based boxes. I have yet to even > lose a file to crashes or my own fumblefingeredness. While that may be true, I'm inclined to point out that the most solid *I've* ever seen is IBM's JFS under AIX 3. It's crash-proof and very fast. I run fsck about twice a year if I remember, and have never had any problems. -- \ / Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu /\ \ PGP public key available on request. MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted. Scheme White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!