Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!paladin.american.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.ans.net!cmcl2!adm!cbda8.apgea.army.mil.!nmrdc1!dsc3pzp From: dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.bugs Subject: Re: my bug list Message-ID: <C4tAAF.86q@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> Date: 1 Apr 93 15:42:14 GMT References: <1993Mar29.142429.12369@cm.cf.ac.uk> <1993Mar29.144932.23840@uvm.edu> <1993Mar30.215055.21172@fcom.cc.utah.edu> Organization: Naval Medical Research & Development Command Lines: 21 In article <1993Mar30.215055.21172@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes: > [... text deleted ...] > >I don't think the problem of autoconfiguration, at least on an ISA bus, >yields 100% to any potential attack; we are going to have to continue >providing static configuration information to all but a small subset >of all devices. > > > Terry Lambert > terry@icarus.weber.edu > terry_lambert@novell.com Us poor-folk with only ISA sure prefer this approach to dropping support for ISA!! -- ============================================================================== phil perucci | "Any opinions expressed are my views, dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil | not the position of any organization" ==============================================================================