Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
From: cgd@toe.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development
Subject: Re: QIC NEWS; vol. 1, no. 3
Date: 9 Apr 93 01:59:53
Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <CGD.93Apr9015953@toe.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <1993Mar23.175701.21077@olymp.informatik.uni-bonn.de>
<jmonroyC57Hu4.841@netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: toe.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: jmonroy@netcom.com's message of Fri, 9 Apr 1993 07:51:39 GMT
In article <jmonroyC57Hu4.841@netcom.com> jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes:
=>Let's get this motion straight right now. I do not
=>intend to let hardware manufactures consribe our designs
=>in the future. They will design to what we need, not
=>the other way around.
hate to break it to you, but compared to the rest of the PC market,
386bsd users, or any free *nix users, or any *nix users,
or even any "relatively-advanced-operating-systems" users
are just a very very small drop in the bucket...
chris
--
Chris G. Demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
"386bsd as depth first search: whenever you go to fix something you
find that 3 more things are actually broken." -- Adam Glass