*BSD News Article 14553


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:34529 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1651
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ogicse!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu!not-for-mail
From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes
Message-ID: <1qo0lq$1hm4@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 16 Apr 93 20:22:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: hal.1qo0lq$1hm4
References: <1993Apr15.225354.18654@samba.oit.unc.edu>
Organization: dis
Lines: 14
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.ai.mit.edu


In article <1993Apr15.225354.18654@samba.oit.unc.edu>
Brandon.Vanevery@launchpad.unc.edu (Brandon Vanevery) writes:
>
> 386BSD has better TCP/IP, for now.
>
> Linux is far less resource-hungry, due to shared libraries.

For now.

-- 
 \  /   Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu
 /\ \   PGP public key available on request.  MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted.
Scheme  White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!