Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:34529 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1651 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ogicse!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu!not-for-mail From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes Message-ID: <1qo0lq$1hm4@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> Date: 16 Apr 93 20:22:18 GMT Article-I.D.: hal.1qo0lq$1hm4 References: <1993Apr15.225354.18654@samba.oit.unc.edu> Organization: dis Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.ai.mit.edu In article <1993Apr15.225354.18654@samba.oit.unc.edu> Brandon.Vanevery@launchpad.unc.edu (Brandon Vanevery) writes: > > 386BSD has better TCP/IP, for now. > > Linux is far less resource-hungry, due to shared libraries. For now. -- \ / Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu /\ \ PGP public key available on request. MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted. Scheme White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!