*BSD News Article 14600


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:34644 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1677
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!uunet!newsflash.concordia.ca!sifon!storm
From: storm@cs.mcgill.ca (Marc WANDSCHNEIDER)
Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes
Message-ID: <1993Apr17.194235.23685@sifon.cc.mcgill.ca>
Sender: news@sifon.cc.mcgill.ca
Nntp-Posting-Host: mnementh.cs.mcgill.ca
Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
References: <1qo0lq$1hm4@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <1993Apr17.161516.2794@serval.net.wsu.edu> <1qpk76$bbl@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1993 19:42:35 GMT
Lines: 16

In article <1qpk76$bbl@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) writes:
>
>You make it sound like 386BSD *can't* use code from Linux.  This is
>bogus.  It's just very carefully chosen which parts are worthwhile,
>which aren't, and which need to be redone.
>

	On this note, I'm curious to hear if there is any plan to make
shared libraries standard in 386bsd...?  I have seen one patch for this
out on the net, but I don't know if many people are using it, and if 
wfj plans on adding this feature in 0.2 (official)...

	Anybody a little more clued in on this one than I?

	toodlepip!
	Marc 'em.