Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:34710 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1696 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!usc!enterpoop.mit.edu!ai-lab!hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu!not-for-mail From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes Date: 17 Apr 1993 19:13:00 -0400 Organization: dis Lines: 13 Message-ID: <1qq2ts$1lo8@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> References: <1993Apr15.225354.18654@samba.oit.unc.edu> <1993Apr17.161516.2794@serval.net.wsu.edu> <1qpk76$bbl@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <1993Apr17.194341.4562@serval.net.wsu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.ai.mit.edu In article <1993Apr17.194341.4562@serval.net.wsu.edu> hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (HJ Lu) writes: > > That means no GNU copyrighted code in the "official" 386bsd release. You are full of shit. The `official' release include GCC, GDB, GNU tar, and several other pieces of GNU code. -- \ / Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu /\ \ PGP public key available on request. MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted. Scheme White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!