*BSD News Article 14624


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:34710 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1696
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!usc!enterpoop.mit.edu!ai-lab!hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu!not-for-mail
From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes
Date: 17 Apr 1993 19:13:00 -0400
Organization: dis
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <1qq2ts$1lo8@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
References: <1993Apr15.225354.18654@samba.oit.unc.edu> <1993Apr17.161516.2794@serval.net.wsu.edu> <1qpk76$bbl@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <1993Apr17.194341.4562@serval.net.wsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.ai.mit.edu


In article <1993Apr17.194341.4562@serval.net.wsu.edu> hlu@eecs.wsu.edu
(HJ Lu) writes:
>
> That means no GNU copyrighted code in the "official" 386bsd release.

You are full of shit.  The `official' release include GCC, GDB, GNU
tar, and several other pieces of GNU code.

-- 
 \  /   Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu
 /\ \   PGP public key available on request.  MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted.
Scheme  White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!