Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: SIGKILL and kill Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1993 03:01:55 GMT Message-ID: <C5nsF8.35H@sugar.neosoft.com> Keywords: SIGNALS SECURITY References: <1qo3mq$d4b@news.cs.tu-berlin.de> <9304171535.ab08751@gate.demon.co.uk> Lines: 11 In article <9304171535.ab08751@gate.demon.co.uk> damian@centrix.demon.co.uk (damian) writes: > have seen a SIGKILL will soon follow. In fact I have been trying to > work out why sh ignores SIGTERM when at the command prompt (it behaves > properly when running a script). So you can do "kill 0" to get rid of background processes without logging out. -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Oletko halannut suttasi tänään? 'U` Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.