*BSD News Article 14635


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:34750 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1705
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!news.amherst.edu!twpierce
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes
Message-ID: <C5nwI4.4v1@unix.amherst.edu>
Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss
Organization: Blasny Blasny, Consolidated (Amherst, MA Offices)
References: <1993Apr15.225354.18654@samba.oit.unc.edu> <1993Apr17.175431.25015@coe.montana.edu> <1993Apr17.190517.4276@serval.net.wsu.edu> <1993Apr17.205715.11278@coe.montana.edu>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1993 04:30:04 GMT
Lines: 13

In article <1993Apr17.205715.11278@coe.montana.edu> nate@cs.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes:

>No, my purpose is to make 386BSD completely re-distrubutable, with NO
>strings attached.  That means Sun, DEC, HP, Ren and Stimpy, or whoever
>can take this code and sell a binary copy of it.  The GPL does not allow
>this.

You really think that?  Snort.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                /  ?Usted es la de la tele, eh?  !La madre
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /  del asesino!  !Ay, que graciosa!
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /    -- Pedro Almodovar