Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:34842 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1726 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!uunet!psinntp!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1993 20:20:56 GMT Message-ID: <C5p4Ix.G9n@sugar.neosoft.com> References: <1993Apr17.190517.4276@serval.net.wsu.edu> <1993Apr17.205715.11278@coe.montana.edu> <D87-MAL.93Apr18165428@byse.nada.kth.se> Lines: 12 > I also don't understand why you think it's ok for a developer to > take the BSD code, add their own fixes to it without making them available, > and then sell the system binary only with the most restricting copyright > notice you can imagine, Gee, I don't recall Sun claiming they owned *my* code because I linked it with their toolkits. -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Oletko halannut suttasi tänään? 'U` Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.