Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!uunet!psinntp!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: 386BSD vs. BSD/386: Which is better for me? Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1993 12:19:46 GMT Message-ID: <C5qCwz.5n5@sugar.neosoft.com> References: <VIXIE.93Apr16115459@cognition.pa.dec.com> <25254@ksr.com> Lines: 14 In article <25254@ksr.com> jfw@ksr.com (John F. Woods) writes: > that time, Novell should own USL rather than AT&T, and they don't have the > same *emotional* attachment to monopolies that AT&T execs have (a business > attachment, sure), so they may be much less likely to sue again just to > harass BSDI out of existence. This is a completely unfounded assertion. There is no evidence that *AT&T* had anything to do with the suit, and Rob Pike has stated that AT&T didn't *want* USL to initiate the suit. -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Oletko halannut suttasi tänään? 'U` Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.