*BSD News Article 14711


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:35018 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1754
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!news.amherst.edu!twpierce
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes
Message-ID: <C5r22L.8p7@unix.amherst.edu>
Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss
Organization: Blasny Blasny, Consolidated (Amherst, MA Offices)
References: <C5qCnn.5Kw@sugar.neosoft.com> <1qugu1$g30@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1993 21:23:08 GMT
Lines: 17

In article <1qugu1$g30@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> damien@b63519.student.cwru.edu (Damien Neil) writes:

>I can use gcc to make an application, link in a
>GPL'd library, and sell the whole thing for thousands of dollars while keeping
>the source code in a locked safe in Siberia. The only restriction the GPL
>imposes is that programs that contains actual GPL'd source code must fall under
>the GPL. (Note: linking in a library != using source code.)

Where do you suppose the library code came from?  Was it just born
there?

Followups are set to gnu.misc.discuss.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                /  ?Usted es la de la tele, eh?  !La madre
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /  del asesino!  !Ay, que graciosa!
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /    -- Pedro Almodovar