*BSD News Article 14752


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.os2.programmer:10972 comp.os.coherent:8959 comp.os.linux:35093 comp.os.mach:2733 comp.os.minix:21857 comp.periphs:3496 comp.unix.bsd:11857 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:2396 comp.os.386bsd.development:489
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!DIALix!xanadu!earth
From: earth@xanadu.DIALix.oz.au (Robert Chalmers)
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.coherent,comp.os.linux,comp.os.mach,comp.os.minix,comp.periphs,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.os.386bsd.development
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.coherent,comp.os.linux,comp.os.mach,comp.os.minix,comp.periphs,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.os.386bsd.development
Distribution: world
Subject: Re: Flowchart symbols (in ASCII) ISO-1028
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
References: <1qv171INN417@srvr1.engin.umich.edu>
Message-ID: <9304214818@xanadu.DIALix.oz.au>
Organization: Mackay Tafe College. Queensland.
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 93 10:44:42 aest-10
Lines: 31

Mark Montague (plph@engin.umich.edu) wrote:
: In article <1993Apr19.171135.19105@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:
: >
: >The two places I have seen flow charts in the real world were to sell IBM
: >flowcharting forms (like printer spacing charts, except they couldn't
: >serve a useful purpose in a second life as 1:1.5 scale graph paper) and in
: >the museum of science and industry.
: >
: >
: >					Terry Lambert
: >					terry@icarus.weber.edu

: There *is* a use for flowcharts:  I have found that non-programmers
: (lawyers, managers, etc...) can read understand them much better than
: pseudo-code, state machines, and transition diagrams.  They look pretty,
: and they're graphical, so they don't scare the people who wear business
: suits.

: I use flowcharts when I want to make a non-programmer understand a
: algorithm.

: 		Mark Montague
: 		plph@caen.engin.umich.edu

So thats what I was doing wrong at the budget committe. I will 
now use flow charts!!! Thanks Mark. I guess I tend to forget even 
I don't truly understand NULL pointers.