*BSD News Article 14753


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:35100 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1774
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!uunet!pipex!uknet!comlab.ox.ac.uk!OLIS.LIB.OX.AC.UK!JOSE
From: JOSE@OLIS.LIB.OX.AC.UK (Jose Marques)
Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes
Message-ID: <16BB6B19D.JOSE@OLIS.LIB.OX.AC.UK>
Organization: Library Automation Service
X-Newsreader: NNR/VM S_1.3.2
References: <1993Apr15.225354.18654@samba.oit.unc.edu> <1993Apr17.175431.25015@coe.montana.edu> <1993Apr17.190517.4276@serval.net.wsu.edu> <1993Apr17.205715.11278@coe.montana.edu> <1993Apr17.231000.103368@zeus.calpoly.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 93 12:37:45 BST
Lines: 11

>
>That makes me ill. It really does. When I code stuff and release it to
>the public domain, I stipulate that the stuff is free and is free to
>modify, but ANYTHING that is derived from my code or that USES the
 
I always though that once one had put something into the public domain
then one lost all rights to make restrictions on how that item was
used.  Is this wrong?
--
Jose Marques, Systems Programmer
 %INCLUDE STDSCLMR