Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: 386BSD vs. BSD/386: Which is better for me? Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1993 01:52:33 GMT Message-ID: <C5rEJL.n49@sugar.neosoft.com> References: <25254@ksr.com> <C5qCwz.5n5@sugar.neosoft.com> <C5qM2y.G79@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Lines: 19 In article <C5qM2y.G79@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gsh7w@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy) writes: > Peter da Silva writes: > #There is no evidence that *AT&T* > #had anything to do with the suit, and Rob Pike has stated that AT&T didn't > #*want* USL to initiate the suit. > At the time of the suit, I was under the understanding that AT&T owned > at least 51 percent of the USL stock. I would count that as evidence > of having something to do with the suit. Yes, I know that if my dog eats your begonias I'm responsible for paying for the damage. But that doesn't mean that I'm going to eat your begonias nor that my dog will be any better behaved after I sell him to a mutual neighbour. -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Oletko halannut suttasi tänään? 'U` Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.