Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:35393 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1838 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!stein2.u.washington.edu!tzs From: tzs@stein2.u.washington.edu (Tim Smith) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Summary of Linux vs. 386BSD vs. Commercial Unixes Date: 22 Apr 1993 00:59:48 GMT Organization: University of Washington School of Law, Class of '95 Lines: 11 Message-ID: <1r4qm4INN6ac@shelley.u.washington.edu> References: <1993Apr17.205715.11278@coe.montana.edu> <1993Apr17.231000.103368@zeus.calpoly.edu> <9304181046.aa28257@gate.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: stein2.u.washington.edu jemenake@trumpet.calpoly.edu (Joe Emenaker) writes: >That makes me ill. It really does. When I code stuff and release it to >the public domain, I stipulate that the stuff is free and is free to >modify, but ANYTHING that is derived from my code or that USES the >binaries has to be free as well. I think that the GNU agreement is If you do this, then you have not released your code into the public domain. If you put something in the public domain, then *ANYONE* can do *ANYTHING* with it. --Tim Smith