Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!nate From: nate@cs.montana.edu (Nate Williams) Subject: Re: QIC NEWS vol.1 Special Edition #1 Message-ID: <1993Apr22.050954.11172@coe.montana.edu> Keywords: QIC FDC NEWS Sender: usenet@coe.montana.edu (USENET News System) Organization: CS References: <jmonroyC5py56.B85@netcom.com> <1993Apr21.194624.7170@fcom.cc.utah.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1993 05:09:54 GMT Lines: 25 In article <1993Apr21.194624.7170@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes: >> The ever present Great Patchkit debate. > >Your views on the patchkit are clear; however, I will remind you of several >facts you have seemed to overlook in their formation, or perhaps simply >chosen to ignore for convenience sake: > ... > >3) You underestimate the work required. Were it still "my baby", I > would give you a shot at doing a release to better educate you to > this fact. It's fine to come up with a plan to bell the cat as > long as you are not the one who has to do it. Even without your > suggestion that weekly releases are "required" in your previous > posting, your suggestions regarding the patchkit have been naieve. > Preach it.... Amem, Brother. :-) (I can say this, I know how much work it is. :-) -- osynw@terra.oscs.montana.edu | Still trying to find a good reason for nate@cs.montana.edu | these 'computer' things. Personally, work #: (406) 994-4836 | I don't think they'll catch on - home #: (406) 586-0579 | Don Hammerstrom