Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!umeecs!niagara.eecs.umich.edu!khushro From: khushro@niagara.eecs.umich.edu (Khushro Shahookar) Subject: Re: Leadership Message-ID: <1993Apr26.184407.18453@zip.eecs.umich.edu> Keywords: netbsd, 386bsd and beyond Sender: news@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Mr. News) Reply-To: khushro@niagara.eecs.umich.edu (Khushro Shahookar) Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor References: <C5yH0F.Hn6@ns1.nodak.edu> <hastyC5z10p.Buo@netcom.com> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1993 18:44:07 GMT Lines: 18 In article <hastyC5z10p.Buo@netcom.com>, hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) writes: |> What is interesting is that the Unix culture keeps getting fragmented and |> diluted after so many years. Oh, well... |> ...Just like the UNIX filesystem. Looks like the developers have learned something from their software :-) Is this BSD split due to a power struggle between 2 Berkeley professors, to see who gets a bigger chunk of research funds, whereas the rest of the world is blindly switching to whoever brings out the latest release? Both 386BSD and netbsd are from Berkeley, right? -- Copyright KHUSHRO SHAHOOKAR, $0.02 khushro@eecs.umich.edu Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor