*BSD News Article 15298


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.os2.programmer:11272 comp.os.coherent:9141 comp.os.linux:36466 comp.os.mach:2814 comp.os.minix:22026 comp.periphs:3580 comp.unix.bsd:11927 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:2536 comp.os.386bsd.development:606
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.coherent,comp.os.linux,comp.os.mach,comp.os.minix,comp.periphs,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.os.386bsd.development
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!utzoo!henry
From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: QIC NEWS ----- FLASH
Message-ID: <C67Cur.Frs@zoo.toronto.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1993 16:37:37 GMT
References: <jmonroyC66G2s.Dzw@netcom.com>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 25

In article <jmonroyC66G2s.Dzw@netcom.com> jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes:
>       "I should note at that time, mid-1964, we had the ability to run
>        a fork process."
>...
>                As some of you are aware, there have been accusations that
>        the current BSD source has source code that is copyright by
>        USL (Unix System Laboratories).  These statements by Mr. Hardy point,
>        in some light, with good possibilities that USL is incorrect...

This is sheer ignorance, I'm afraid.  Whether the notion of "fork" existed
before Unix has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with the questions of
trade secret and/or copyright that are being fought over right now.  A
copyright, on source code or anything else, protects only the form of
expression, not the ideas expressed.  And the Unix concept of "fork" --
as opposed to its implementation -- cannot be a trade secret since it
has been public knowledge since Unix's earliest days.  USL has made some
stupid claims, but they haven't gone this far.

Furthermore, Hardy's statement is not news.  Thompson and Ritchie, in
the classic CACM paper that first publicized Unix widely, said:  "The
fork operation, essentially as we implemented it, was present in the
GENIE time-sharing system."  Those words were published in 1974, folks.
-- 
SVR4 resembles a high-speed collision   | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
between SVR3 and SunOS.    - Dick Dunn  |  henry@zoo.toronto.edu  utzoo!henry