*BSD News Article 15321


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:252 comp.os.linux:36538
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!peter
From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Linux/386bsd on a diskless workstation
Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1993 23:56:15 GMT
Message-ID: <C67x5s.J7C@sugar.neosoft.com>
References: <1993Apr22.214040.27674@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <C5zLuL.KBC@sugar.neosoft.com> <1993Apr28.020740.27332@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
Lines: 18

In article <1993Apr28.020740.27332@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:
> This is *very* different from the suggestion that (to put it bluntly) some
> sort of half-assed support should be rigged to allow something like a
> Diamond Speedstar to work without the manufacturer having to stoop to
> acknowledging the existance of something other than DOS.

But it doesn't bother you to set up some half-assed support to allow Novell
to ignore anything but DOS... and now Unixware?

> The reason behind propritary interfaces in the DOS market is to allow a
> company to compete in a given market with an inferior product...

If it's an inferior product why are people buying it?
-- 
Peter da Silva.  <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>.
 `-_-'   Har du kramat din varg idag?
  'U`    
"Det er min ledsager, det er ikke drikkepenge."