Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.bugs Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!alberta!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!acs.ucalgary.ca!cpsc.ucalgary.ca!ajfcal!novatel!hpeyerl From: hpeyerl@novatel.cuc.ab.ca (Herb Peyerl) Subject: Re: Patches for if_ec.* to work with BPF Message-ID: <1993Apr28.165133.8100@novatel.cuc.ab.ca> Sender: news@novatel.cuc.ab.ca (The UseNet USER) Organization: "NovAtel Communications Ltd. Calgary, Alberta, Canada" X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] References: <1993Apr26.071622.3817@email.tuwien.ac.at> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1993 16:51:33 GMT Lines: 23 Martin BIRGMEIER (mbirgmei@email.tuwien.ac.at) wrote: : Below are the patches I hacked up to get my 3c503 card to work with the : Berkeley Packet Filter. I have been using them for a while now (since : well before pk 0.2 came along) and they seem to be running fine. To : arrive at them, I simply diffed the old and new versions of if_we*, and : manually applied the resulting changes to if_ec.* (these interfaces are : the same for all practical purposes, the chip being the same as I : understood from the comments in if_ec.c). So basically if_ec.* should : now offer all of the functionality of if_we* (I hope :-)). grrrr... :-> I spent a couple of hours last night doing just that and was going to test it tonight before releasing it... Guess you beat me to it... Incidentally; I just want it known that "I" didn't have the stupid printf in ecinit when I released it... That was a another Jolitz-ism.. (actually; this whole post was just an excuse to mention that!) -- "I was early to finish | hpeyerl@novatel.cuc.ab.ca <Reply-To> | I brew | I was late to start, I | peyerlh@cuug.ab.ca | there- | might be an adult, but | #define JANITOR "Network Anal-yst" | fore I | I'm a minor at heart." | JANITOR, NovAtel Communications Ltd.| AM. |