*BSD News Article 16298


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.bugs
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!rtech!amdahl!hip-hop!dfox
From: dfox@hip-hop.suvl.ca.us (David Fox)
Subject: Re: Backspace problem, xterm scroll bar problem.
Keywords: Backspace problem, xterm scroll bar problem.
References: <C76sxB.3Lq@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1t9k8aINNo9h@srvr1.engin.umich.edu>
Organization: Hip-Hop BBS, Sunnyvale California
Date: Wed, 19 May 1993 16:43:39 GMT
Message-ID: <C7A94s.K8D@hip-hop.suvl.ca.us>
Lines: 38

scottl@engin.umich.edu (scott allen long) wrote:
>In article <C76sxB.3Lq@ra.nrl.navy.mil> colbert@typhoon.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Brad Colbert) writes:
>>I have a problem when I run xinit from a textual (console) login
>>my backspace key doesn't work correctly in an xterm.  Even when I 
>>try to set it with gtty erase.  It doesnt delete the characters on the
>>xterm, but it doen move the cursor back.  Works fine when loading from

>
>You probably have an FPU-less system (386 or 486SX).  XFree 1.2 was compiled

Assuming this is a correct description of the original poster's system,
he IMHO will be MUCH better off if he runs out and gets a coprocessor.
Personally, I recommend Cyrix.  The emulator in 386BSD consumes a lot
of overhead and is quite slow.  For example (on my 386SX/16, without
a coprocessor, whetstone (FP benchmark) took over 8 minutes of wall
clock time to run.  Ghostscript (another relatively high FP-using
program) would take 20 minutes just to initialize.  With a coprocessor
installed, the run time went to a second or two.
>results or will crash.  Exaples: oclock, xeyes, and ico will dump core as
>soon as they are loaded; the buttons for xman and xcalc will be badly
>mis-drawn; Athena scoll bars are useless; etc....  The good news is that

Which will most likely make such applications quite slow if no coprocessor
is found.  And, gcc 1.39 isn't exactly bug-free or optimal in its code
generation either.

I would recommend that gcc-2.3.3 still be used to compile Xfree, and

somewhere in the relevant FAQs state that X requires a coprocessor.
>-sl
>>--                   


-- 
David E. Fox                                   email: hip-hop!dfox@amdahl.com
5479 Castle Manor Drive                   
San Jose, CA 95129                  Thanks for letting me change the magnetic
408/ 253-7992                       images on your hard drive.