*BSD News Article 17000


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:3298 comp.unix.bsd:12098 comp.os.mach:3015
Newsgroups: comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!news.service.uci.edu!gordius!frsvnsvn!kurt
From: kurt@frsvnsvn.cts.com (Kurt Werle)
Subject: Re: Anyone has experiences of NeXTSTEP?
Message-ID: <1993Jun11.002146.15665@frsvnsvn.cts.com>
Followup-To: comp.sys.next.advocacy
Keywords: NeXTSTEP
Reply-To: rmyers@dec5200.acs.uci.edu
Organization: little to none
References: <1993Jun9.032038.1087@rai.juice.or.jp> <1993Jun10.015221.20104@kronos.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1993 00:21:46 GMT
Lines: 34

In article <1993Jun10.015221.20104@kronos.arc.nasa.gov> simpson@kronos.arc.nasa.gov (Kenneth H. Simpson) writes:
>In article <1993Jun9.032038.1087@rai.juice.or.jp> tetsuji@rai.juice.or.jp (Tetsuji Rai) writes:
>>  Title says it all.
>>  I want to know about the graphic capabilities, network capabilities,
>>and supported cards for network, and graphics and its speed.
>>
>>Tetsuji
>
>I'm interested in NeXStep for the i486 - is it Mt Xinu's Mach386 with 
>the NeXTStep GUI? Is it possible to build a Mach3.0 kernel? Does it 
>support EISA bus (or anyother bus other than the AT bus?) Is there an 
>upper bound on the physical memory (16 Mbytes?)   

I suggest that you ask at comp.sys.next.advocacy, but I'll answer here
in case you don't get csna.

NS for Intel (or any platform, for that matter) *AS I UNDERSTAND IT*
	(and I'm typing from a NeXT)
CMU's Mach 2.5, as hacked up by NeXT.
'BSD Unix' on that
NeXTSTEP 'on that'.
Supports TCP/IP, and Novell (plug and play -- a joy), Appletalk is
	now 3rd party.
Graphics on intel (currently): up to 24 bit, 1024 x 812 +/-
Runs great if you have a moderately nice machine, slow if you
don't put in enough memory.
As for busses/cards supported, there's a (constantly updated)
compatibility guide.
Memory max depends on your hardware (My NeXT could go to 32Meg
(old NeXT )).

The 3.0 kernel... I dunno.  I heard that someone made PLAN 9 run on
a NeXT box, so I guess anything's possible...