Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.mail.elm:9289 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:889 comp.os.linux:42926 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!torn!nott!bnrgate!bnr.co.uk!uknet!mcsun!sun4nl!tuegate.tue.nl!svin09.info.win.tue.nl!adv.win.tue.nl!adv.win.tue.nl!not-for-mail From: devet@adv.win.tue.nl (Arjan de Vet) Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.linux Subject: Re: NetBSD/386bsd elm problem - empty message bodies Date: 11 Jun 1993 20:08:19 +0200 Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands Lines: 27 Message-ID: <1vahmj$g9@adv.win.tue.nl> References: <1utcu1INNfu9@hrd769.brooks.af.mil> <3586@bigfoot.first.gmd.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: adv.win.tue.nl In article <3586@bigfoot.first.gmd.de> ats@bsd386.first.gmd.de (Andreas Schulz) writes: >In article <1utcu1INNfu9@hrd769.brooks.af.mil> burgess@hrd769.brooks.af.mil >(Dave Burgess) writes: >>In pl20, the sendmail line is constructed to look like this: >>( ( sendmail -options name ; rm tmpfile ) < tmpfile) & ) >>I changed the sequence to look like this: >>( ( sendmail -options name <tmpfile ; rm tmpfile) & ) >You will find that change in elm 2.4, pl22. That's the current >version. Someone with a linux system and bash as a shell found >that error also. I was the one with the Linux system and bash. However, I was using a beta version of bash 1.13 which has fixed a bug from bash 1.12. This bash 1.12 bug caused the old sendmail line to work just fine. When I started testing bash 1.13, people started complaining about my empty messages :-). I changed the sendmail line in the same way Dave did. Arjan -- Arjan de Vet <Arjan.de.Vet@adv.win.tue.nl> (home) Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands <devet@win.tue.nl> (work)