Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!decwrl!pa.dec.com!e2big.mko.dec.com!decvax.dec.com!jtkohl From: jtkohl@zk3.dec.com (John Kohl) Subject: Re: Digiboards and BSDI/386 In-Reply-To: terry@cs.weber.edu's message of Fri, 11 Jun 93 18:18:07 GMT Message-ID: <1993Jun12.022844.7448@e2big.mko.dec.com> Sender: usenet@e2big.mko.dec.com (Mr. USENET) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation References: <1993Jun4.094829.6159@spcvxb.spc.edu> <1v45qu$im@urmel.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <1993Jun11.080552.6234@spcvxb.spc.edu> <1993Jun11.181807.8884@fcom.cc.utah.edu> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1993 02:28:44 GMT Lines: 17 In article <1993Jun11.181807.8884@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes: > 4) The pollenization goes both ways, and the 386BSD community > also benefits. > BSDI has been > mostly fair about (4), although they have gotten major benefits (like the > ISOFS and console drivers) actually, BSDI comes with its own BSDI-written ISO 9660 and Rock Ridge file system code. -- John Kohl <jtkohl@zk3.dec.com> or <jtkohl@mit.edu> working for but not representing: Digital Equipment Corporation Member of the League for Programming Freedom---get details: lpf@uunet.uu.net (The above opinions are MINE. Don't put my words in somebody else's mouth!)