*BSD News Article 17723


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:3398 comp.unix.bsd:12144
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,alt.os.bsdi,comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!uunet!decwrl!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!bigbob
From: bigbob@netcom.com (Robert Fickling)
Subject: Re: 386BSD vs. BSD386
Message-ID: <bigbobC9FK42.CpK@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
References: <1993Jun30.000804.13384@news.csuohio.edu> <20qpjf$p6l@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <hastyC9F2vF.2Kw@netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1993 10:36:02 GMT
Lines: 16

>
>One annoying bug in BSDI is that it crashes the system if I don't pipe
>the output to a file when I start the X server.
>And its new X server  also does not restore the screen properly upon exiting.
>
 
I run BSD386 1.0 on a 386/33 with a NEC 4FG and a Orchard(sp?)ProDesigner II
video card. Starting the X server has *NEVER* crashed my system and the
screen is *ALWAYS* restored properly. Probably different hardware and
obviously different results?! I really like BSD386. :-)
 
Bob

-- 
   Robert Fickling      
   Email: bigbob@netcom.com