Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:3418 comp.unix.bsd:12155 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,alt.os.bsdi,comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!hasty From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Subject: Re: 386BSD vs. BSD386 Message-ID: <hastyC9GBFx.H9D@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <bigbobC9FK42.CpK@netcom.com> <hastyC9FwCw.Esw@netcom.com> <VIXIE.93Jun30123754@gw.home.vix.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1993 20:26:20 GMT Lines: 20 In article <VIXIE.93Jun30123754@gw.home.vix.com> vixie@gw.home.vix.com (Paul A Vixie) writes: >> Very please to hear that it works properly for you. I know at least >> 16 machines at work which the X server upon startup can crash the >> system with BSD386 1.0 . > >Are those 16 machines all similar hw configurations? > >Are any of the ones that crash or fail to restore screen state running >an X server that wasn't supplied with BSD/386? >-- The X server is the one supplied by BSD/386 and (at work) we have various configurations like scsi, ide, et4000, S3 801 cards, 486/33 486/66, etc. Amancio -- This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3 Amancio Hasty | Home: (415) 495-3046 | ftp-site depository of all my work: e-mail hasty@netcom.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming