Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:3430 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:1014 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!uunet!mcsun!sunic!isgate!veda.is!adam From: adam@veda.is (Adam David) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.bugs Subject: Re: Patchkit 0.2.4 (sio, comcontrol) Message-ID: <C9GMnC.8D@veda.is> Date: 1 Jul 93 00:28:09 GMT References: <20aubn$oeq@thumper.cc.utexas.edu> <C9C0zw.3uy@veda.is> Organization: Veda Systems, Iceland Lines: 17 [I wrote] >btw, the patchkit didn't unpack the sources for comcontrol so they needed >unpacking by hand from /patch/installed/patch00163/part.10.tar.z And a few people mentioned that it unpacked alright. Very strange. I downloaded it from freefall.cdrom.com because the other 2 sites would not give anonymous ftp login, and it was not on agate yet. It was the tar.z package in /pub/patch-kit. Are there different versions of the 0.2.4 patchkit out there? After doing IALL in the patches program, part.10 only existed as the tar.z file referenced above, and part.11 only existed as part.11 in the same directory. Which file is this supposed to become? It is not mentioned in the FILES-BY-PATCH listing. part.11 is the example kernel config file. -- adam@veda.is