*BSD News Article 17767


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:3432 comp.unix.bsd:12159
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,alt.os.bsdi,comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!crcnis1.unl.edu!wupost!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!ames!pacbell.com!att-out!cbnewsj!dwex
From: dwex@mtgzfs3.att.com (David E. Wexelblat)
Subject: Re: 386BSD vs. BSD386
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1993 23:49:11 GMT
Message-ID: <C9GKu0.BEB@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
References: <hastyC9FwCw.Esw@netcom.com> <CPETTERB.93Jun30130928@mickey.javelin.sim.es.com> <VIXIE.93Jun30124151@gw.home.vix.com>
Sender: news@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (NetNews Administrator)
Nntp-Posting-Host: mtgz058.gaz.att.com
Lines: 39

In article <VIXIE.93Jun30124151@gw.home.vix.com> vixie@gw.home.vix.com (Paul A Vixie) writes:
> > There are two X servers on the BSD386 1.0 release.  The default server is
> > the one from SGCS, and I can't get it to work, and there are many people
> > who can't, but just switching to the other X server (which just requires
> > changing which file is called), and there are no problems.  If you didn't
> > try the other server, I'm not surprised that you had problems.  The reason
> > that the SGCS server is the default is probably because it has more drivers
> > that the other server, but they don't function as well.  Don't sell the
> > other server short!
> >
> > Cary
> 
> The other server looks a lot like Xfree86, btw, which is derived from the
> earlier (public) release of X386 from SGCS.  Different lineages but mostly
> the same code.  I'm using the SGCS version ("X386-SGCS") and it works fine;
> I just tried the Xfree86 version ("Xbsdi386") and it works fine, too.
> --
> Paul Vixie
>                                      "Be neither a conformist or a rebel,
> <paul@vix.com>                        for they are really the same thing.
> decwrl!vixie!paul                     Find your own path, and stay on it." (me)

Any particular reason why no one at BSDI has sent XFree86 the patches
required to build it on BSD/386?  Unless they feel like porting XFree86
2.0 to BSD/386 (which will be a pain in the butt - the OS support in DDX
is going to change a LOT).  Sending us patches now will save them a lot
of pain later.

Just curious.

--
David Wexelblat <dwex@mtgzfs3.att.com>  (908) 957-5871  Fax: (908) 957-5627
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 200 Laurel Ave - 3F-428, Middletown, NJ  07748

XFree86 requests should be addressed to <xfree86@physics.su.oz.au>

"How many times must good men die?  How many tears will the children cry,
 'til we suffer no more sadness?  Oh, stop the madness.  Stop all the madness."
        -- Molly Hatchet, Fall Of The Peacemakers.