*BSD News Article 17972


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
From: brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk (Brian Somers)
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!demon!awfulhak.demon.co.uk!brian
Subject: Re: Need help building kernel 
Distribution: world
References: <1993Jun14.194935.8760@alw.nih.gov>
Organization: tp
Reply-To: Brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.21)
Lines: 28
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1993 18:42:44 +0000
Message-ID: <741897764snz@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

In article <1993Jun14.194935.8760@alw.nih.gov> crtb@helix.nih.gov writes:

>Sorry about the dumb question, but..  How do I rebuild the kernel?
>
>I have the bin08, etc08, and src08 distributions, which appear to
>include some of the kernel sources (somewhere?).  I even found the
>GENERICISA config file, and ran config to create my own.  It's when I
>ran make, that I discovered I didn't have param.h.
>
>I found a param.h in the source tree at agate, and I presume that's the
>one.  But how much of that source tree should I ftp?  And is there a
>tarred version of it, so that I don't miss anything?
>

Perhaps I know the answer...

I originally got 386BSD from a friend, patchkit included.  I also had the
forsight to tape the bin01, etc01 and src01 archives.  Recently I decided
to sort out which patch level I was at, so I removed /usr/src, reloaded
from src01, and ran 'patches' from the 0.2.3 patch-kit.  It didn't work.

After much confusion, I realized that a lot of (if not all) the src .h
files are on the bin01 distribution......

Is yours the same problem ??!?

-- 
Brian <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>