Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.minix:22456 comp.os.386bsd.misc:585 comp.os.386bsd.questions:3576 comp.os.linux:46721 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!umd5.umd.edu!roissy.umd.edu!mark From: mark@roissy.umd.edu (Mark Sienkiewicz) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.linux Subject: Re: Choosing a Unix like OS for a pc (plan 9 compilation time) Date: 6 Jul 1993 21:37:37 GMT Organization: University of Maryland Lines: 18 Message-ID: <21crb1$et8@umd5.umd.edu> References: <20sscl$brc@usenet.mcs.kent.edu> <21250i$lnm@umd5.umd.edu> <217pm5$s6v@news.u.washington.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: roissy.umd.edu In article <217pm5$s6v@news.u.washington.edu> tzs@stein2.u.washington.edu (Tim Smith) writes: >mark@elea.umd.edu (Mark Sienkiewicz) writes: >>>So *my* wish (requirement) list for a 32-bit OS goes like this: >... >>You don't want much. Seriously. I want all these things too: >... >>11. Exchanges mail and news over UUCP. > >Why do you want mail and news in the OS rather than as applications? It's colloquial usage of "OS". It's like saying "The latest version of the Unix SYSV operating system has the Korn shell". I don't mean to imply that I want UUCP in the kernel any more than the original poster meant he wanted the C compiler in the kernel (as opposed to an application) when he said >6. C (maybe C++) or Oberon compilers. (Oberon is a clean, small OOP language)