*BSD News Article 18146


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!hrd769.brooks.af.mil!hrd769.brooks.af.mil!not-for-mail
From: burgess@hrd769.brooks.af.mil (Dave Burgess)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: Virtual memory problem
Date: 8 Jul 1993 20:34:16 -0500
Organization: Armstrong Laboratory, Brooks AFB, TX
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <21ihv6$5t4@hrd769.brooks.af.mil>
References: <21i13cINN229@srvr1.engin.umich.edu> <D> <1993Jul9.001503.8706@news.arc.nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hrd769.brooks.af.mil

In article <1993Jul9.001503.8706@news.arc.nasa.gov> root@wanderer.nsi.nasa.gov (Michael C. Newell) writes:
}In article <21i13cINN229@srvr1.engin.umich.edu>, cobb@cheddar.engin.umich.edu (Paul Cobb) writes:
}|> 
}|> 	Okay, I'm going nuts now. I'm using the straight 386bsd 0.1 and trying to compile my code. It's giving me a running out of virtual memory error during
}|> compile on some of the routines. However there is 20 meg of swap space in the
}|> b partition. Is there a problem with the gcc compiler in straight 386bsd 0.1
}|> or something. There is just no way it should use up 20 megs of virtual memory
}|> to compile one routine. Any help would be appreciated.
}|> 
}
}Another FAQ candidate??  I ran into this too; I got about 10 Email messages
}telling me to check out the csh "limit" command.
}
}

Too late :-)

It is already in there.  

-- 
------
TSgt Dave Burgess
NCOIC AL/Management Information Systems Office
Brooks AFB, TX